This is a London news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Rachel Reeves news.
For more London news, you can click here:
more London newsFor more Rachel Reeves news, you can click here:
more Rachel Reeves newsFor more banking & finance news, you can click here:
more banking & finance newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like banking & finance news, you might also like this article about
British Private Equity. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest senior private equity bosses news, private equity news, banking & finance news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
private equity bossesGuardian
•
80% Informative
Rachel Reeves had originally pledged to raise 565 m a year by cracking down on indefensible’ tax loophole that left carried interest taxed as a capital gain at 28% .
That compares with the 45% rate of income tax applied to higher earners and most City bonuses.
The move will raise just 300 m for the exchequer by 2030 .
Top London private equity lawyer Neel Sachdev sparked fear in March when he warned that a tax hike could do more harm to London ’s status as a dealmaking centre than Brexit .
Sachdev said it was “terrific” that the government had “acknowledged the need to safeguard the strength of the UK as a private equity and asset management hub” But others said the government could have “gone further”.
VR Score
85
Informative language
86
Neutral language
25
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links