This is a news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to Frida Ghitis: news.
For more Frida Ghitis: news, you can click here:
more Frida Ghitis: newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
future election. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest partisan gerrymandering claims news, constitutional challenges news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
election oversightThe New Republic
•76% Informative
David Gergen : John Roberts is not your friend after a decade and a half of anti-voter, antidemocracy decisions.
Gergen says the Supreme Court is the heart of Republican political power.
If a tight 2024 election works its way to his court, it could provide the pretext for the GOP supermajority to install Trump , he says.
Frida Ghitis: Supreme Court ruling on gerrymandered maps shows danger of overruling state courts in elections.
She says it's chilling to say state courts don't have free rein; it's not clear what the court might consider transgressive.
Ghitis says Supreme Court could decide in 2020 whether to override state rulings to count votes.
Frida Ghitis: Supreme Court is positioning itself to decide next ideologically driven challenges to our democratic process with no clear standard at all.
She says it's not credible to suppose that it could be trusted for rubber-stamping the critical operations of our democracy to the perpetual minoritarian advantage of Team Red .
Ghitis says the Supreme Court has already shown its willingness to alter process, invent doctrines and predetermine outcomes for its own side.
VR Score
80
Informative language
79
Neutral language
33
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
25
Source diversity
18
Affiliate links
no affiliate links