Disinformation Influences Political Support
This is a news story, published by Northeastern Global News, that relates primarily to Facebook, Instagram and X news.
News about Us campaigns & elections
For more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsNortheastern Global News news
For more news from Northeastern Global News, you can click here:
more news from Northeastern Global NewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
campaign rallies. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest campaigns news, campaign managers news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
social media engagementNortheastern Global News
•New research sheds light on how the 2016 and 2020 elections were won, lost — and the ‘critical’ role disinformation played
85% Informative
Researchers studied data from platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) to measure changes in political support across 2016 and 2020 presidential elections.
They tracked data points such as the daily number of followers on official accounts; user reaction to the candidates’ posts; the volume of disinformation associated with, or targeting, the candidates.
The researchers also found that disinformation played a central role in shaping both discourse and polling during the two election cycles.
“I think we’re one of the only studies in marketing or political science that also has offline word-of-mouth conversations,” Pauwels says. “Very often online chatter is seen as a bubble, specifically if you only look at X or Facebook. And what you see there is just not representative of how the majority of Americans feel or behave.”.
VR Score
88
Informative language
89
Neutral language
48
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
72
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links