This is a news story, published by calgaryherald, that relates primarily to Anthony news.
For more Anthony news, you can click here:
more Anthony newsFor more Us police misconduct news, you can click here:
more Us police misconduct newsFor more news from calgaryherald, you can click here:
more news from calgaryheraldOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us police misconduct, you might also like this article about
Alberta Serious Incident Response Team. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest involved officers news, Law Enforcement Review Board news, news about Us police misconduct, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Police Act investigationcalgaryherald
•
70% Informative
Patrick and Irene Heffernan argue the officers' cell phones should have been confiscated immediately following the fatal shooting of their son Anthony .
The four officers had responded to the Super 8 hotel after hotel staff claimed Anthony , 27 , had missed his checkout time.
After they agreed armed entry was warranted, the officers used force to break down the door.
After investigating the shooting, ASIRT recommended charges be laid against Cst Maurice McLoughlin , who fired the shots that killed Anthony , but there was not enough evidence for a conviction.
Patrick Heffernan said he and his wife Irene want to see more accountability from police to ensure other families do not suffer a similar outcome.
The LERB panel will meet to review the submissions before issuing a decision within the next 60 days .
The panel is expected to meet in the next two weeks to make a decision.
VR Score
71
Informative language
68
Neutral language
68
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
5