Women's Equality Party Success
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Women’s Equality news.
News about civil rights activism
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
former WE candidates. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest mainstream party news, UK politics news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Equality partyGuardian
•Why we decided to back a motion to close the Women’s Equality party | Catherine Mayer and Sandi Toksvig
72% Informative
Women’s Equality party (WE) will back a motion proposing its closure at November 's special conference.
They say they are calling for an end as a new beginning to the party's existence.
The Women's Equality party was founded by women and girls at the sharp end of inequality.
Other parties have been quick to notice, recruiting former WE candidates with promises of safer seats.
As a result, our candidates can find themselves contesting seats alongside sisters-in-arms who wear the colours of another party but were or are WE members.
WE have worked particularly closely with the Green party , helping to draft a cross-party bill.
VR Score
73
Informative language
70
Neutral language
28
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links