This is a Britain news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Charles news.
For more Britain news, you can click here:
more Britain newsFor more Charles news, you can click here:
more Charles newsFor more royal families news, you can click here:
more royal families newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about royal families, you might also like this article about
slavery reparations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest reparatory justice news, Reparations news, news about royal families, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Slavery Reparations IntensifyPeople
•
75% Informative
Reparations advocate Laura Trevelyan says the King “is stuck in a bit of a holding pattern" when it comes to issuing an apology for Britain 's role in the slave trade.
Charles acknowledged the “painful aspects of our past” in a speech to Commonwealth Heads of Government on Friday, Oct. 25 .
The King has supported an investigation into the royal family's connections to slavery.
During a visit to the Bahamas in 2021 , he expressed his anguish over the crimes of the past, describing the "appalling atrocity of slavery" Charles furthered his commitment to the issue in Kigali , Rwanda , in 2022 .
VR Score
76
Informative language
72
Neutral language
40
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
52
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links