Campus Censorship Overshadows Free Speech
This is a news story, published by Washington Examiner, that relates primarily to Doescher news.
News about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsWashington Examiner news
For more news from Washington Examiner, you can click here:
more news from Washington ExaminerAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
free speech. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest censorship news, First Amendment right news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
censoriousnessWashington Examiner
•Tiana Lowe Doescher talks free speech as deciding factor for 2024 - Washington Examiner
60% Informative
A new survey finds 63% of voters say free speech is a very important deciding factor for the 2025 presidential election.
Citizens’ fear of consequence from the federal government for practicing their First Amendment right is nothing new, according to Doescher .
“ First , government needs to do no harm, and that means shut down all these DHS programs to surveil parents who are concerned about what their kids are learning as domestic terrorists,” she said.
VR Score
58
Informative language
51
Neutral language
64
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links