Nuclear power priority in UK
This is a Britain news story, published by Notes on Growth | Sam Dumitriu, that relates primarily to Hinkley Point C news.
Britain news
For more Britain news, you can click here:
more Britain newsenergy & natural resources news
For more energy & natural resources news, you can click here:
more energy & natural resources newsNotes on Growth | Sam Dumitriu news
For more news from Notes on Growth | Sam Dumitriu, you can click here:
more news from Notes on Growth | Sam DumitriuAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like energy & natural resources news, you might also like this article about
nuclear power. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Nuclear Industry news, Great British Nuclear SMR competition news, energy & natural resources news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
nuclear energyNotes on Growth | Sam Dumitriu
•How red tape holds back nuclear power in Britain
69% Informative
UK Day One think tank recently surveyed 43 leading British experts on economic growth (plus myself) Nuclear power is the number two priority area that the government should invest its time and political capital in.
Hinkley Point C , currently under construction, will cost 6 times more to build per megawatt than its South Korean equivalent.
As of 2004 , any practice that may expose the public to ionising regulation must be justified’. That is to say, the benefits must outweigh the costs of radiation exposure.
Every new nuclear reactor design has to apply to have their new practice’ approved as a justified use of ionising radiation.
This means that every new reactor design counts as a new practice requiring regulatory justification.
It can take over two years to receive a decision.
Most applications for regulatory justification address classes of use e.g. Use of ionising radiation (X-ray) imaging to support scientific age assessments of age-disputed persons’ New models of X-Rays used in hospitals do not require individual approval rather the entire use class is approved.
This would cover a wide range of reactor designs, including all medium-term proposals in Britain .
VR Score
70
Informative language
70
Neutral language
8
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links