T-Mobile, AT&T Oppose Phone Unlocking Rule
This is a US news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to FCC news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newstech giants news
For more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsWired news
For more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
Mobile Locking Policy. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest prepaid phones news, handset subsidies news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Verizon RulesWired
•AT&T and T-Mobile Claim Locked Phones Are Good, Actually
86% Informative
T-Mobile and AT&T say US regulators should drop a plan to require unlocking of phones within 60 days of activation.
The FCC is proposing "to require all mobile wireless service providers to unlock handsets 60 days after a consumer's handset is activated with the provider, unless within the 60-day period the service provider determines the handset was purchased through fraud.
The proposed rule has support from consumer advocacy groups who say it will give users more choice.
Consumer Groups: Make Verizon Rules Industry-Wide.
Verizon is the most amenable to the FCC 's new rules.
Verizon said it supports a uniform approach to handset unlocking that allows all wireless providers to lock wireless handsets for a reasonable period of time.
T-Mobile told the FCC last month that "none of the litany of Title III provisions cited in the NPRM support the expansive authority asserted here to regulate consumer handsets".
VR Score
85
Informative language
84
Neutral language
50
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
17
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links