This is a news story, published by Metro, that relates primarily to NHS news.
For more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsFor more news from Metro, you can click here:
more news from MetroOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
NHS. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest British public news, health secretary news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
health serviceMetro
•
58% Informative
The government launched a website asking for ideas on how the NHS might be improved.
But there was an inevitable avalanche of very silly proposals among the sincere ones.
Several of them focused on saving money, with one suggesting all doctors should be called Doctor Who.
Another suggested using passive aggressive energy from GP receptionists to power up to 50% of the electricity needed by the NHS .
VR Score
43
Informative language
32
Neutral language
6
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
42
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links