This is a news story, published by ABC News, that relates primarily to Michael Chad Hoeppner news.
For more Michael Chad Hoeppner news, you can click here:
more Michael Chad Hoeppner newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from ABC News, you can click here:
more news from ABC NewsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
Wisconsin Senate debate performances. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest debate tonight news, debates news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Wisconsin Senate debateABC News
•70% Informative
Columbia University professor Michael Chad Hoeppner analyzed Friday night 's Wisconsin Senate debate between Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin and her Republican challenger, Eric Hovde .
He believes Baldwin did what was necessary on Friday night to maintain her position in the Senate race.
Hoesppner noted that businessman Hovede appeared somewhat rattled in the debate.
Michael Chad Hoeppner : Hovde's part of his pitch to voters is that he's a businessman.
He says he didn't deliver in that argument tonight , in his view, in your view.
He said both candidates substantively did a decent job in the debate.
VR Score
79
Informative language
82
Neutral language
56
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
34
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links