This is a news story, published by CNBC, that relates primarily to The Supreme Court news.
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from CNBC, you can click here:
more news from CNBCOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
federal consumer product safety watchdog. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal agencies news, conservative justices news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
consumer protection agencyCNBC
•
76% Informative
The Supreme Court declined to hear a conservative challenge to job protections for the leaders of the federal consumer product safety watchdog.
The case would have given the justices a chance to reassess a 1935 precedent that limits a president's ability to fire certain agency heads.
The current Supreme Court , with a 6 -3 conservative majority, has taken an expansive view of presidential powers.
VR Score
84
Informative language
87
Neutral language
80
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
80
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links