Rayner's Workers' Rights Reform Costs
This is a UK news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Angela Rayner news.
UK news
For more UK news, you can click here:
more UK newsAngela Rayner news
For more Angela Rayner news, you can click here:
more Angela Rayner newsworkforce / labor news
For more workforce / labor news, you can click here:
more workforce / labor newsTelegraph news
For more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like workforce / labor news, you might also like this article about
wages. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest 1bn annual bill news, statutory sick pay news, workforce / labor news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
new costsTelegraph
•Rayner’s workers’ rights overhaul to cost employers up to £5bn a year
70% Informative
Angela Rayner ’s overhaul of workers’ rights could cost employers as much as 5bn a year.
The Deputy Prime Minister described the changes as the biggest upgrade to rights at work for a generation’ But the Government’s impact assessment warned there will be “a direct cost on employers” The impact assessment said the 4.5bn bill was equivalent to a 0.4pc increase in wages across the UK .
VR Score
79
Informative language
82
Neutral language
50
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links