This is a news story, published by PsyPost, that relates primarily to Twitter news.
For more Twitter news, you can click here:
more Twitter newsFor more human rights news, you can click here:
more human rights newsFor more news from PsyPost, you can click here:
more news from PsyPostOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about human rights, you might also like this article about
Elon Musk Push Academics Off Twitter. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest academic Twitter engagement news, Twitter usage news, news about human rights, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
academic Twitter usagePsyPost
•
79% Informative
A recent study examined the impact of Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter , now known as “X,” on academic engagement with the platform.
The researchers looked at several types of engagement, including original tweets, retweets, replies, and quote tweets.
They found that verified accounts were more likely to reduce their engagement with Twitter than non-verified accounts.
The study shows a correlation between Musk’s takeover and the drop in activity.
It does not conclusively prove that his policies or behavior directly caused the reduction in academic engagement.
Another challenge is the study's reliance on Twitter 's free Application Programming Interface ( API ), which was removed after Musk took over.
VR Score
88
Informative language
93
Neutral language
65
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
76
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links