AI Criticism Affects Wikipedia Reliability
This is a Wikipedia news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to WikiProject AI Cleanup news.
Wikipedia news
For more Wikipedia news, you can click here:
more Wikipedia newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
WikiProject AI Cleanup. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI content news, Wikipedia editors news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
common AI catchphrasesThe Cool Down
•Wikipedia editors form urgent task force to combat rampant issues with recent wave of content: 'The entire thing was ... [a] hoax'
76% Informative
WikiProject AI Cleanup aims to combat problem of unsourced, poorly written AI-generated content on Wikipedia .
Some instances are easy to spot, but others are more difficult to identify.
Fake citations of real but irrelevant sources can often go undetected for months .
Wikipedia editors also remove images that are anatomically incorrect, intentionally misleading or inaccurate.
VR Score
70
Informative language
67
Neutral language
7
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
70
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
17
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links