California AI Bill Vetoed
This is a California news story, published by Time Magazine, that relates primarily to Gavin Newsom news.
California news
For more California news, you can click here:
more California newsGavin Newsom news
For more Gavin Newsom news, you can click here:
more Gavin Newsom newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsTime Magazine news
For more news from Time Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Time MagazineAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI policy. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest radical AI advancement news, AI Futures Project news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI regulation bill SBTime Magazine
•4 Ways to Advance Transparency in Frontier AI Development
84% Informative
The debate over California 's AI regulation bill SB 1047 was vetoed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in late September .
Authors: It was America ’s first major public conversation about AI policy, but it will not be our last.
They propose a framework that will allow the public to gain insight into what capabilities we can expect future AI systems to possess.
Bill would require frontier AI companies to publish safety cases about their AI models.
These safety cases would not be subject to regulatory approval; instead, the purpose of sharing them is for the public and scientific community to be able to evaluate them.
Whistleblower protections are essential to hold AI companies accountable to the law and to their own commitments.
VR Score
87
Informative language
87
Neutral language
54
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links