"Rethinking Climate Mitigation"
This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
Julian Zelizer news
For more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsclimate change news
For more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
future climate engineering. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest more climate warming news, climate engineering news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
climate modificationThe Hill
•Science
Science
Opinion: Cutting emissions isn’t enough: Counteract global warming with geoengineering
76% Informative
Is it time to consider geoengineering or climate engineering, artificially cooling the planet more seriously? The idea has been floated for at least a half century now, and taken seriously by some forward-looking thinkers for a couple decades .
We need to be very careful about this idea, and learn much more before we do it, says Julian Zelizer .
Zelizer: Any effort at partial global cooling would involve messing with Mother Nature .
Michael O’Hanlon: We don’t want to overshoot the mark and cool the planet relative to pre-industrial temperatures.
By the time any decision might be made (in the 2030s ?), temperature rises may well have reached 1.5 degrees .
He says wealthy industrialized countries that have emitted the most carbon dioxide should pay the most.
O'Hanlon argues we should together pay for the whole thing.
VR Score
80
Informative language
78
Neutral language
47
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?