China Embassy Rejected in Tower Hamlets
This is a Beijing news story, published by Evening Standard, that relates primarily to Tower Hamlets news.
Beijing news
For more Beijing news, you can click here:
more Beijing newsNews about United kingdom politics
For more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsEvening Standard news
For more news from Evening Standard, you can click here:
more news from Evening StandardAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
Tower Hamlets councillors. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest new Chinese embassy premises news, new Chinese embassy news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Tower HamletsEvening Standard
•Angela Rayner calls in plans for Chinese super embassy in east London
77% Informative
Tower Hamlets councillors rejected the scheme despite planning officers recommending approval.
But Beijing resubmitted them in August without making any major changes.
An inspector will now hold a public inquiry into the project before ministers make a final decision.
Government spokesman said the application “raised planning issues of more than local importance”.
VR Score
77
Informative language
74
Neutral language
59
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links