This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to AI news.
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
reason AI companies. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI innovation news, AI companies news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI revolutionGuardian
•
66% Informative
A consultation is soon to open, the Financial Times reports, that will allow AI companies to scrape content from individuals and organisations unless they explicitly opt out of their data being used.
Data is vital to AI systems because it helps them to develop facsimiles of how we interact.
Tech companies know that, which is why they are penning licensing deals for content left, right and centre.
OpenAI a company now valued at more than $150bn is planning to forswear its founding non-profit principles to become a for-profit company.
It has more than enough money in its coffers to pay for training data, rather than rely on the public.
Companies like that can certainly afford to put their hands in their own pockets.
VR Score
56
Informative language
48
Neutral language
23
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
41
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links