Judge Denies Trump's Stay-of-Order Motion

This is a news story, published by CourtListener, that relates primarily to Appendix news.

Appendix news

For more Appendix news, you can click here:

more Appendix news

News about Us circuit and appeals courts

For more Us circuit and appeals courts news, you can click here:

more Us circuit and appeals courts news

CourtListener news

For more news from CourtListener, you can click here:

more news from CourtListener

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us circuit and appeals courts, you might also like this article about

judicial proceedings

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest criminal court proceedings news, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT news, news about Us circuit and appeals courts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

litigation options

CourtListener

•

Order on Motion to Continue – #265 in United States v. TRUMP (D.D.C., 1:23-cr-00257) – CourtListener.com

Summary

Nutrition label

69% Informative

The court granted leave for the Government to file a redacted version of the Appendix to its Motion for Immunity Determinations .

The court stayed the public docketing of that Appendix for seven days , however, granting Defendant ’s request for time to “evaluate litigation options” Judge Tanya S. Chutkan : None of those arguments are persuasive.

A potential juror’s exposure to information about the case is precisely the kind of issue best addressed at voir dire.

The parties and court can ask individualized questions to probe potential bias or impartiality.

Defendant argues that it is “essential that the public fully understand the arguments and documents on both sides of this momentous [immunity] issue.

Defendant’s Motion to Continue Stay of Order , ECF No. 264 , is hereby DENIED.

In a separate order on October 18, 2024 , the court will lift the stay and direct the Clerk of the Court to docket the Appendix , with the Government 's proposed redactions.

Date: October 17, 2024 .

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech