This is a Alphabet news story, published by Default, that relates primarily to EU news.
For more Alphabet news, you can click here:
more Alphabet newsFor more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsFor more news from Default, you can click here:
more news from DefaultOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
speech policies. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest platform speech rules news, Devising speech rules news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
speech governanceDefault
•82% Informative
Deciding what people can say and do on the internet is increasingly becoming, in corporate-speak, a “compliance” function.
Whether that reframing of speech governance will be a net positive for internet users or society remains to be seen.
The shift toward compliance-oriented governance of online speech is driven by laws like the EU ’s Digital Services Act .
To comply with the DSA, companies like Meta and Alphabet have opened their doors and their databases to sweeping annual audits.
The DSA spells out relevant areas of “risk,” including such vast and potentially competing societal priorities as “freedom of expression” and protecting the “rights of the child” But you can’t see what the affected posts actually said.
Governments can, in the guise of regulating “systems,” easily cross the line into simply telling platforms to suppress lawful speech.
DSA compliance is expensive, pushing trust and safety resources out of substantive decision-making about user posts.
The second concern is about competition and missed opportunities to evolve past our current internet ecosystem.
VR Score
85
Informative language
85
Neutral language
42
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
42
Source diversity
36
Affiliate links
no affiliate links