This is a America news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Francis Galton news.
For more America news, you can click here:
more America newsFor more Francis Galton news, you can click here:
more Francis Galton newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
current eugenicists. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Great Gatsby news, keen eugenicists news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
US eugenicistsGuardian
•
64% Informative
Eugenics was formalised as a scientific discipline in the 19th century by the Victorian polymath Francis Galton .
He dedicated his life to promoting the idea that certain populations could and should be improved via selective breeding of humans.
The hive of scientists in America responsible for the spread of eugenics even provided inspiration for the Third Reich .
Dr Adam Rutherford is a lecturer in genetics at UCL and the author of How to Argue With a Racist .
He says the current renaissance of eugenics and race science is nothing more than bigotry dressed up as biology.
The science very clearly evidences this, and no amount of cosplay race science or human biodiversity can debunk it.
VR Score
58
Informative language
53
Neutral language
9
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
8
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links