This is a UK news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Kirkegaard news.
For more UK news, you can click here:
more UK newsFor more Kirkegaard news, you can click here:
more Kirkegaard newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
UK Biobank data misuse. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest UK Biobank news, UK Biobank representative news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
UK Biobank dataGuardian
•
73% Informative
UK Biobank holds genetic information, survey responses, blood samples and medical records of 500,000 volunteers.
Some of the group have been blacklisted by the facility on the grounds they are “not bona fide” academics.
The footage suggests they may have circumvented the facility's controls.
It shows them saying they obtained a “large” haul of the data.
Head of Human Diversity Foundation’s media arm revealed the group had obtained UK Biobank data.
Two eminent geneticists questioned the organisation's position, as did two health data experts.
They pointed to terms the race science researchers used suggesting they had obtained individual participant data with names stripped out.
“The thing about the UK Biobank files,” said Kirkegaard , “is that they’re so fucking large a 300-gigabyte file” He did not reveal who had helped him obtain the dataset.
“If there have been friendly researchers who have passed them the data that way that’s a huge breach of standards and it needs to be investigated by UK biobank.”.
VR Score
72
Informative language
70
Neutral language
17
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links