Rangers' 15 Goals, Lack Grade-A Opportunities

This is a news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Igor Shesterkin news.

Igor Shesterkin news

For more Igor Shesterkin news, you can click here:

more Igor Shesterkin news

hockey news

For more hockey news, you can click here:

more hockey news

New York Post news

For more news from New York Post, you can click here:

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like hockey news, you might also like this article about

Rangers

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest many chances news, Maple Leafs news, hockey news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

Henrik Lundqvist

New York Post

•

Exclusive | Rangers know they can’t keep getting away with turnovers: ‘No. 1 culprit’

Summary

Nutrition label

71% Informative

The Rangers have scored 15 goals in three games so far in their 2 -0-1 start to the season.

The Blueshirts are yielding too many chances, specifically Grade-A opportunities.

The doorstep in front of Igor Shesterkin has too often served as a welcome mat.

Turnovers have been the No. 1 culprit.

But the Rangers can be better attending to their details. They can be better at avoiding turnovers. They can be better on the defensive side of the puck. “That’s one of the focuses on this trip,” Trocheck said. “For sure.”.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

informal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful