This is a Tate Britain news story, published by Quillette, that relates primarily to Rex Whistler news.
For more Tate Britain news, you can click here:
more Tate Britain newsFor more Rex Whistler news, you can click here:
more Rex Whistler newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Quillette, you can click here:
more news from QuilletteOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Tate Britain gallery. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Tate Britain news, mural painting news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Rare Meats MuralQuillette
•77% Informative
In late 2020 , the Tate Britain gallery announced the permanent closure of its restaurant, which is decorated with a mural painted in the late 1920s by Rex Whistler , titled Pursuit of Rare Meats .
Some members of the public had complained about the mural’s “stereotypical” representation of people of colour.
The trustees succumbed to activist pressure and closed the restaurant for good.
The original Public Works of Art program was inspired by an earlier initiative organised by the Mexican government in 1922 .
The idea was to lift the country's spirit as compensation for its people’s material deprivation.
The New Deal murals were as socialist as could be—art for the people, by the people.
Some parents complained that the mural was exposing students to racist material.
The case went to San Francisco’s superior court, where the judge ruled the mural could not be removed because the school board had not conducted an environmental review.
But she also pointed out that since the painter was a communist, his depiction of the president as a slave owner was obviously not an endorsement of slavery but a critique.
VR Score
78
Informative language
78
Neutral language
21
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
71
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links