This is a Spielkamp news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Matthias Spielkamp news.
For more Spielkamp news, you can click here:
more Spielkamp newsFor more Matthias Spielkamp news, you can click here:
more Matthias Spielkamp newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
French welfare agency. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest European privacy rules news, French government news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
French algorithmWired
•
85% Informative
A coalition of human rights groups have launched legal action against the French government over its use of algorithms to detect miscalculated welfare payments.
The French welfare agency analyzes the personal data of more than 30 million people.
The algorithm, used since the 2010s , gives each person a score between 0 and 1 , based on how likely it estimates they are to be receiving payments they are not entitled to.
“Many of these welfare systems that do this fraud detection may, in my opinion, be social scoring in practice,” says Matthias Spielkamp , cofounder of the nonprofit Algorithm Watch . Yet public sector representatives are likely to disagree with that definition—with arguments about how to define these systems likely to end up in court. “I think this is a very hard question,” says Spielkamp ..
VR Score
87
Informative language
86
Neutral language
66
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links