This is a the United States news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Snap news.
For more the United States news, you can click here:
more the United States newsFor more Snap news, you can click here:
more Snap newsFor more agriculture news, you can click here:
more agriculture newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like agriculture news, you might also like this article about
food policy. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal food policy news, food assistance programs news, agriculture news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal food policiesGuardian
•
75% Informative
Project 2025 is a proposed mandate for the next Republican president authored by the Heritage Foundation , a conservative thinktank.
It outlines steps that would radically transform food and farming, curtailing recent progress to address the excess of ultra-processed foods in the United States .
Project 2025 proposes changes to the country’s food assistance programs, like Snap and the Women, Infants and Children supplemental nutrition program.
The Republican -controlled House considered a bill that would “fundamentally change” the dietary guidelines process, he says.
The bill was abandoned in favor of a continuing resolution to fund the government.
Nestle says Project 2025 would promote industry over climate, public health or welfare concerns.
VR Score
74
Informative language
71
Neutral language
51
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
69
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links