Ontario Costs $4.3M for Wage-Cap Case
This is a news story, published by Global News, that relates primarily to Doug Ford news.
Doug Ford news
For more Doug Ford news, you can click here:
more Doug Ford newsNews about labor activism
For more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsGlobal News news
For more news from Global News, you can click here:
more news from Global NewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
Ontario taxpayers. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest unconstitutional legislation news, salary increases news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
wage restraintGlobal News
•Ontario taxpayers fork over $4.3 million to settle legal costs in Bill 124 cases | Globalnews.ca
63% Informative
Ontario taxpayers have forked over $4.3 million in legal fees defending a wage-cap law that was struck down as unconstitutional.
Premier Doug Ford ’s government passed a law in 2019 to limit salary increases for broader public sector workers at one per cent per year for three years .
The law sparked outrage among the 800,000 workers affected by the bill.
VR Score
70
Informative language
71
Neutral language
40
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links