This is a news story, published by Slate Magazine, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more weightlifting & bodybuilding news, you can click here:
more weightlifting & bodybuilding newsFor more news from Slate Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Slate MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like weightlifting & bodybuilding news, you might also like this article about
trans athletes. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest powerlifter news, trans news, weightlifting & bodybuilding news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Classic Trump hyperboleSlate Magazine
•66% Informative
Donald Trump told a story about a decades-old women’s weightlifting record that was purportedly broken with ease by a man who had “never lifted before” but cheated the system by identifying as trans.
The details don’t really line up with the vague scenario that Trump describes in his stump speech, in which he sometimes claims to have watched actual footage of a woman losing a competition to the trans lifter in question.
Donald Rumsfeld , former White House chief of staff, former defense secretary, coined the phrase in 1982 .
The phrase is commonly used in the business world.
It pops up often in transcripts of earnings calls, and a satirical 2014 Forbes piece about management jargon defined it as a useful way to describe a theory that is not supported by the numbers that are supposed to support it.
VR Score
66
Informative language
62
Neutral language
15
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
21
Source diversity
19
Affiliate links
no affiliate links