Pressure mounts on Reeves over benefits cuts
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Jeremy Hunt news.
Jeremy Hunt news
For more Jeremy Hunt news, you can click here:
more Jeremy Hunt newsNews about United kingdom business & economics
For more United kingdom business & economics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom business & economics newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom business & economics, you might also like this article about
disability benefit spending. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest child benefit cap news, Budget Responsibility news, news about United kingdom business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
benefits cutsGuardian
•Pressure mounts on Rachel Reeves to drop ‘dangerous’ £1.3bn cut to benefits for disabled
73% Informative
Thinktank says 420,000 people who are unable to work through disability or ill-health could lose up to 4,900 a year.
The Resolution Foundation says key aspects of the policy have not been thought through.
The changes to the work capability assessment (WCA) were first announced by former Tory chancellor Jeremy Hunt last September .
VR Score
74
Informative language
70
Neutral language
60
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links