This is a news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Boris Johnson news.
For more Boris Johnson news, you can click here:
more Boris Johnson newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
Downing Street. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Westminster news, Downing news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
George DowningThe Times & The Sunday Times
•65% Informative
Boris Johnson spent at least 110,000 on gold wallpaper and other lurid refurbishments.
The former PM is far from the first resident to give Westminster ’s most celebrated address a scathing review.
The original street, a cul-de-sac of brick terraced houses, was built in the early 1680s by George Downing , a diplomat and spy.
Even during her imperial pomp, Margaret Thatcher never seemed to mind the faded gentility of life at No 10.
When she first took up residence in 1979 , she went through the proposed refurbishing bill with a fine-toothed comb.
She paid for the redecoration of the flat, bought her own ironing board and even organised and paid for her own cleaner.
VR Score
73
Informative language
77
Neutral language
23
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
46
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links