This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to US Court of Appeals news.
For more music news, you can click here:
more music newsFor more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like music news, you might also like this article about
infringement notices. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest copyright infringement news, contributory copyright infringement news, music news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
infringementArs Technica
•82% Informative
The conservative-leaning US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit sided with the big three record labels against Grande Communications .
The appeals court ordered a new trial on damages because it said the $46.8 million award was too high.
But the appeals court affirmed the lower court's finding that Grande is liable for contributory copyright infringement.
VR Score
86
Informative language
89
Neutral language
48
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
78
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links