This is a U.S. news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Palmer Luckey news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Palmer Luckey news, you can click here:
more Palmer Luckey newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
autonomous lethal weapons. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI safety news, lethal AI news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
autonomous weaponsTechCrunch
•
74% Informative
Anduril cofounder Palmer Luckey has expressed openness to autonomous weapons.
Luckey : "Where’s the moral high ground in a landmine that can’t tell the difference between a school bus full of kids and a Russian tank?” The U.S. military currently does not purchase fully autonomous weapons; but it does not ban companies from making them.
Ukrainian officials have pushed for more automation in weapons, hoping it’ll give them a leg-up over Russia .
For many in Silicon Valley and D.C. , the biggest fear is that China or Russia roll out fully autonomous weapons first , forcing the U.S. ’s hand.
VR Score
75
Informative language
72
Neutral language
56
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links