This is a news story, published by Slate Magazine, that relates primarily to David Gergen news.
For more David Gergen news, you can click here:
more David Gergen newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Slate Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Slate MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court intervention. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest fewer serious election disputes news, Supreme Court involvement news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
major Supreme Court interventionSlate Magazine
•
78% Informative
David Gergen : Supreme Court won't take up election-related litigation before November 5 .
He says it's unlikely the court will take up a case that could affect the outcome of the 2024 presidential election.
Gergen says the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to get involved in a dispute over the treatment of certain mail-in ballots.
Julian Zelizer : If Trump narrowly loses, he won't be able to prove to a court that noncitizen voting is happening anywhere.
He says the remaining risk on the horizon of Supreme Court involvement in the election could come if local or state officials, or Congress , fail to follow the will of the people when it comes to certifying the results.
Zelizer says if election officials seek to subvert the election outcome, Supreme Court intervention would be welcome.
VR Score
82
Informative language
82
Neutral language
23
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
18
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links