This is a Garland news story, published by Above the Law, that relates primarily to John Roberts news.
For more Garland news, you can click here:
more Garland newsFor more John Roberts news, you can click here:
more John Roberts newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Above the Law, you can click here:
more news from Above the LawOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
federal gun regulations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal judiciary news, Supreme Court news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
gun regulationsAbove the Law
•
67% Informative
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Garland v. VanDerStok.
The case is about whether “ghost guns” are exempt from background checks.
The Fifth Circuit is an outlier from the rest of the federal judiciary.
Justices John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett need to flip their votes to uphold the circuit.
VR Score
69
Informative language
69
Neutral language
58
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links