This is a news story, published by PsyPost, that relates primarily to David Doherty news.
For more David Doherty news, you can click here:
more David Doherty newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from PsyPost, you can click here:
more news from PsyPostOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
abortion policy opinions. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest restrictive abortion policies news, abortion access news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
abortion rightsPsyPost
•77% Informative
A recent study sheds light on how “Not in My Backyard” attitudes can influence people’s views on abortion access.
NIMBY refers to the tendency of people to oppose developments or services in their local area.
While abortion policy is typically framed as a moral or rights-based issue, the study finds even those who support abortion access may oppose it if the services are offered in their own neighborhood.
The study was authored by David Doherty , Dana Garbarski , and Sasha Shapsis .
People are sensitive to the location where services that violate their moral convictions or protect rights they support would be provided, the study says.
The researchers concluded that NIMBY effects may be more widespread than existing work suggests.
VR Score
88
Informative language
95
Neutral language
44
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
72
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links