Letterboxd Controversy Over Anime
This is a Letterboxd news story, published by Wired.
Letterboxd news
For more Letterboxd news, you can click here:
more Letterboxd newsmovies news
For more movies news, you can click here:
more movies newsWired news
For more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like movies news, you might also like this article about
Marvel movies. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest films news, best films news, movies news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
film fansWired
•The Fight That Nearly Destroyed the Letterboxd Community
73% Informative
Letterboxd removed anime from its official list of top-rated anime movies.
The site's curators said the move was a "careful effort to align our eligibility rules," but users disagreed.
The debate became so big that major directors started weighing in on the decision.
The controversial decision is typical for the site, which has dealt with similar issues for years .
Fifteen million users may not sound like a very impressive base for a social platform, but it’s enormous for such a niche and specific community.
With End of Evangelion, there wasn’t any higher authority—the decision was entirely down to Letterboxd .
VR Score
63
Informative language
53
Neutral language
81
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
48
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
32
Source diversity
17
Affiliate links
no affiliate links