Lawsuit Over Boy's Mascot
This is a California news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Deadspin news.
California news
For more California news, you can click here:
more California newsDeadspin news
For more Deadspin news, you can click here:
more Deadspin newsfootball news
For more football news, you can click here:
more football newsNew York Post news
For more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like football news, you might also like this article about
Chiefs jersey. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Chiefs fan news, Kansas City Chiefs fan news, football news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
black face paintNew York Post
•Deadspin loses bid to toss defamation suit over article accusing young Chiefs fan of racism
53% Informative
The lawsuit was filed by California residents Raul Armenta Jr. and his wife, Shannon , on behalf of themselves and their son, Holden , who attended a game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Las Vegas Raiders last November .
In the article, Deadspin writer Carron Phillips wrote that the boy had “found a way to hate black people and the Native American at the same time.
The Armentas say they made repeated demands for Deadspin to retract the article and apologize.
VR Score
46
Informative language
39
Neutral language
62
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links