This is a Poland news story, published by Notes From Poland, that relates primarily to Duda news.
For more Poland news, you can click here:
more Poland newsFor more Duda news, you can click here:
more Duda newsFor more Europe politics news, you can click here:
more Europe politics newsFor more news from Notes From Poland, you can click here:
more news from Notes From PolandOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Europe politics, you might also like this article about
President Andrzej Duda. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Constitutional Tribunal Act news, Andrzej Duda news, news about Europe politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Constitutional TribunalNotes From Poland
•76% Informative
President Andrzej Duda has refused to sign two bills to overhaul Poland 's constitutional court.
The bills would overhaul the Constitutional Tribunal (TK ) with the aim of undoing the politicisation of the court.
Duda says he has doubts about the constitutionality of the legislation.
He has referred the bills to a body stacked with PiS appointees, including former MPs from the party.
Duda 's decision to refer the two bills to the TK was widely criticised by figures from the ruling camp as well as many legal experts.
The deadlock may only be broken after Duda ’s term ends next year , though much will depend on who is elected to replace him.
The government does not recognise the legitimacy of the court due to the presence of illegitimately appointed judges.
VR Score
71
Informative language
65
Neutral language
52
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
15
Affiliate links
no affiliate links