This is a news story, published by JURIST - Legal News & Commentary, that relates primarily to eSafety news.
For more social media news, you can click here:
more social media newsFor more news from JURIST - Legal News & Commentary, you can click here:
more news from JURIST - Legal News & CommentaryOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like social media news, you might also like this article about
Online Safety Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest abuse practices news, regulatory obligations news, social media news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
child protectionJURIST - Legal News & Commentary
•77% Informative
An Australian court upheld an order on Friday for X to pay a fine of A$ 610,500 for failing to comply with a regulator’s request for information disclosing anti-child-abuse practices.
The eSafety Commissioner sought critical data from X to evaluate its measures against child abuse, a request the company largely disregarded, prompting legal action.
VR Score
76
Informative language
73
Neutral language
50
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
82
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links