Two-child benefit cap hits children

This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Keir Starmer news.

Keir Starmer news

For more Keir Starmer news, you can click here:

more Keir Starmer news

News about inflation

For more inflation news, you can click here:

more inflation news

Guardian news

For more news from Guardian, you can click here:

more news from Guardian

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about inflation, you might also like this article about

child poverty taskforce

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest child benefit cap news, Child Poverty Action Group news, news about inflation, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

Child Poverty

Guardian

•

At least 10,000 children have fallen into poverty under Labour, analysis finds

Summary

Nutrition label

69% Informative

New analysis shows 10,000 more children have fallen into poverty since Keir Starmer took office.

Low-income parents are denied key benefits for their third and any subsequent children born from April 2017 .

Labour government has so far resisted pressure to scrap the policy, with the chancellor reluctant to take on the unfunded pledge’ without citing where the 3bn annual cost would come from.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

possibly offensive

Hate speech

not hateful