This is a genAI news story, published by Liberty Street Economics, that relates primarily to AI news.
For more genAI news, you can click here:
more genAI newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Liberty Street Economics, you can click here:
more news from Liberty Street EconomicsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
genAI tools. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest genAI tool news, GenAI Users news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
More GenAI UsersLiberty Street Economics
•
78% Informative
Many worry about the impact of generative AI (genAI) tools' potential displacement effects in the labor market and the implications for income inequality.
We asked a representative sample of U.S. residents about their experience with genAI tools.
We find relatively few people have used genAI , but those who have used it have a bleaker outlook on its impacts on jobs and future inequality.
Those who have used genAI tools were more pessimistic about inequality in the future.
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or Federal Reserve System .
Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
VR Score
91
Informative language
99
Neutral language
45
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links