Cato Institute Sues Over Audits
This is a U.S. news story, published by Yahoo, that relates primarily to Cato Institute news.
U.S. news
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsYahoo news
For more news from Yahoo, you can click here:
more news from YahooAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest massive surveillance program news, FOIA news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
warrantless surveillanceHuffington Post
•Cato Institute sues government for allegedly withholding audit records on Section 702
68% Informative
Cato Institute sues the government for allegedly withholding audit records on the surveillance program.
The libertarian think tank says the records would have been useful to lawmakers debating whether to renew the law.
Section 702 allows U.S. agencies to keep tabs on communications of foreigners abroad but also caught communications between Americans and foreign nationals that had nothing to do with terrorism.
VR Score
72
Informative language
75
Neutral language
45
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links