MLB Playoff Bracket Preview
This is a news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Padres news.
Padres news
For more Padres news, you can click here:
more Padres newsbaseball news
For more baseball news, you can click here:
more baseball newsNew York Post news
For more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like baseball news, you might also like this article about
Royals prediction. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest American League Division Series predictions news, MLB Betting news, baseball news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Royals oddsNew York Post
•MLB Division Series predictions. MLB Playoffs odds, picks, best bets
69% Informative
The Royals are considered least likely to win the AL Pennant at +475 (bet365) The Tigers seem to have something special going on right now, which makes them a tempting bet as an underdog against a Guardians side that looks fairly beatable.
Backing the Royals to win at +180 is a reasonable option, as is looking for loftier numbers to back them in the series if they lose Game 1 .
The Padres looked to be the most well-rounded team in baseball entering the playoffs.
The Padres ' lineup hit to a third -ranked wRC+ versus righties this season .
The Dodgers aren’t well-suited to expose that flaw with a loaded right-handed staff.
VR Score
75
Informative language
77
Neutral language
41
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
40
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links