This is a news story, published by Christian Science Monitor, that relates primarily to Harris news.
For more Harris news, you can click here:
more Harris newsFor more inflation news, you can click here:
more inflation newsFor more news from Christian Science Monitor, you can click here:
more news from Christian Science MonitorOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about inflation, you might also like this article about
Trump tariffs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest likely tariff news, stiffer tariffs news, news about inflation, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
tariffsChristian Science Monitor
•
79% Informative
Both major party candidates want to keep taxes low for the vast majority of Americans .
Both favor efforts to produce more goods at home rather than importing them.
Neither has a plan to tame an ever rising national debt.
But their economic plans are also very different.
Harris wants to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans .
The bottom fifth of households would get the most money, an estimated $2,355 .
The top 5% of households (those making well over $300,000 a year) would see a tax increase, with the top 0.1% paying an extra $ 167,255 .
For Mr. Trump , the biggest unknown is what he would do with tariffs.
VR Score
86
Informative language
86
Neutral language
64
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
46
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links