Supreme Court Reviews Nuclear Waste Sites
This is a New Mexico news story, published by PBS, that relates primarily to Supreme Court news.
New Mexico news
For more New Mexico news, you can click here:
more New Mexico newsNews about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsPBS news
For more news from PBS, you can click here:
more news from PBSAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
nuclear waste. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest permanent underground storage facility news, nuclear fuel news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
other radioactive wastePBS
•Supreme Court steps into fight over nuclear waste storage in rural Texas and New Mexico
71% Informative
Supreme Court agrees to step into a fight over plans to store nuclear waste at sites in rural Texas and New Mexico .
The outcome of the case will affect plans for a similar facility in New Mexico . Political leaders in both states oppose the facilities.
The push for temporary storage sites is part of the complicated politics of the nation’s so far futile quest for a permanent underground storage facility.
VR Score
79
Informative language
81
Neutral language
69
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links