JD Vance's Debate Performance Criticized
This is a Ohio news story, published by Mother Jones, that relates primarily to Vance news.
Ohio news
For more Ohio news, you can click here:
more Ohio newsVance news
For more Vance news, you can click here:
more Vance newsNews about Us campaigns & elections
For more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsMother Jones news
For more news from Mother Jones, you can click here:
more news from Mother JonesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
JD Vance. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest election news, Trump news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
VanceMother Jones
•Tim Walz just reminded us what happened to Trump's last running mate
63% Informative
JD Vance did a decent job for the first 94 minutes of Tuesday night ’s debate.
But Tim Walz asked the Ohio senator if Trump lost the 2020 election.
“ Tim , I’m focused on the future,” Vance said in a response in which he did not acknowledge that Joe Biden won.
Vance also called it “really rich for Democratic leaders to say that Donald Trump is a unique threat to democracy”.
VR Score
65
Informative language
60
Neutral language
35
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
42
Offensive language
offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links