This is a Springfield news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to JD Vance news.
For more Springfield news, you can click here:
more Springfield newsFor more JD Vance news, you can click here:
more JD Vance newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
presidential debate. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest debate clashes news, VP debates news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
bizarre debate performanceTelegraph
•
56% Informative
JD Vance and Tim Walz approached the debate with remarkable restraint.
There were no car crash moments, undignified spats or vicious name-calling.
The only moment of real heat came during a debate over migrants in Springfield , Ohio .
Mr Vance managed to come across as warm and human, not 'weird' But Mr Walz came unstuck in front of the cameras, stuttering over his words.
JD Vance was able to fight back without falling into the trap of appearing petulant.
He called out the selective fact-checking of the CBS moderator, before launching his own version against his opponent.
Walz struggled to keep up with the young senator, ignoring his direct provocations in favour of railing against Donald Trump .
VR Score
65
Informative language
67
Neutral language
12
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
45
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links