Vance Criticizes Censorship, Big Tech
This is a news story, published by Verge, that relates primarily to JD Vance news.
JD Vance news
For more JD Vance news, you can click here:
more JD Vance newsNews about Us campaigns & elections
For more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsVerge news
For more news from Verge, you can click here:
more news from VergeAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
censorship. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Kamala Harris news, last presidential election news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
alternative electorsVerge
•JD Vance avoids January 6th questions by pivoting to Facebook ‘censorship’
68% Informative
Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) and Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) debated a question about whether they would challenge the 2024 election results.
Vance said that instead of the threats to democracy decried by Democrats , what’s really worrying is the threat of “big technology companies silencing their fellow citizens” Walz responded with the misleading claim that “shouting fire in a crowded theatre” is a Supreme Court test for unprotected speech.
VR Score
69
Informative language
64
Neutral language
68
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links