Counter-intuitive Puzzle Solution
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Timothy Chow news.
Timothy Chow news
For more Timothy Chow news, you can click here:
more Timothy Chow newschess news
For more chess news, you can click here:
more chess newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like chess news, you might also like this article about
Prizes. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest prize version news, search order news, chess news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
single prizeGuardian
•Did you solve it? The box problem that baffled the boffins
63% Informative
The puzzle was first posed (in a slightly different form) by Timothy Chow in 2010 .
It was picked up by StackExchange and more recently by Gil Kalai , a former plenary speaker at the International Congress of Mathematicians , on his blog.
It is interesting to professional mathematicians because even they struggle to find an intuitive explanation for why Andrew gets a prize first .
If you can come up with a simple, intuitive explanation please share it below!.
VR Score
63
Informative language
61
Neutral language
11
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
27
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
1